Clancy Dubos, too little too late.
Clancy Dubos is apparently having some buyers remorse on Bobby Jindal.
My response to him (in that link) is as follows:
Clancy: You endorsed Bobby Jindal. And not only did you endorse him, but you did so by annointing him with such lavish praise. You have come a long way from
“We think the best way to respond is by electing a governor who will fundamentally change our political culture from top to bottom and present Louisiana in a whole new light to the rest of the world. In our view, Congressman Bobby Jindal will be that kind of governor.” (your words)
and
“More than anything else, Bobby Jindal’s integrity is above reproach.” (your words)
to
“What’s becoming obvious is that Governor Jindal, who promised us a “gold standard,” actually wants to give us a “double standard” — one for himself and his cronies, and another for everybody else.” (your words)
This is not “becoming obvious”. This has BEEN obvious to many of us out here who have known for YEARS that Jindal is a hypocrite and not someone to be trusted to bring meaningful ethics reform.
Perhaps you should apologize to your readers for not doing the appropriate research on the candidate you endorsed. Because all of Jindal’s flaws existed well before to the election to those who wanted to see it.