<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hypocrisy in Kenner</title>
	<link>http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/03/26/hypocrisy-in-kenner/</link>
	<description>My personal blog to promote those ideals that our country was founded on.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Z.</title>
		<link>http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/03/26/hypocrisy-in-kenner/#comment-2228</link>
		<author>Daniel Z.</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/03/26/hypocrisy-in-kenner/#comment-2228</guid>
		<description>Hey Deryl, how are you today? Vitter admitted to "serious sins" involving the D.C. prostitute scandal. 

If you would like to sit and think he was talking about making cookies, you are free to delude yourself. Vitter is free to correct me and say that he did not have sex that he paid for with another woman during his marriage. Until then, I will assume that serious sins involving an escort service would involve an affair and prostitution. 

I am always amused when Deryl "the Liar" tries to claim others are lying. You, of course, are far to busy kissing Jindal's hind quarters to actually know what the truth is. You probably still think that Jindal was serious when he said he would bring meaningful ethics reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Deryl, how are you today? Vitter admitted to &#8220;serious sins&#8221; involving the D.C. prostitute scandal. </p>
<p>If you would like to sit and think he was talking about making cookies, you are free to delude yourself. Vitter is free to correct me and say that he did not have sex that he paid for with another woman during his marriage. Until then, I will assume that serious sins involving an escort service would involve an affair and prostitution. </p>
<p>I am always amused when Deryl &#8220;the Liar&#8221; tries to claim others are lying. You, of course, are far to busy kissing Jindal&#8217;s hind quarters to actually know what the truth is. You probably still think that Jindal was serious when he said he would bring meaningful ethics reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4unionparish</title>
		<link>http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/03/26/hypocrisy-in-kenner/#comment-2199</link>
		<author>4unionparish</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/03/26/hypocrisy-in-kenner/#comment-2199</guid>
		<description>"David Vitter admitting to violating the law and to cheating on his wife." NOT

This is always the trouble with anything you say, DanZ. You insist on lacing it with your madeup BS.

Oh, and didn't you get the memo. That "100 Year" remark is a lie, too.

This is really a shortcoming of you Dim's that you should work on to fix.

Yes, I know it would be very much out of character for you and your lying buddy,[url=http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=226] Chris[/url], to actually tell the truth, but hey, it's your character that really needs fixing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;David Vitter admitting to violating the law and to cheating on his wife.&#8221; NOT</p>
<p>This is always the trouble with anything you say, DanZ. You insist on lacing it with your madeup BS.</p>
<p>Oh, and didn&#8217;t you get the memo. That &#8220;100 Year&#8221; remark is a lie, too.</p>
<p>This is really a shortcoming of you Dim&#8217;s that you should work on to fix.</p>
<p>Yes, I know it would be very much out of character for you and your lying buddy,[url=http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=226] Chris[/url], to actually tell the truth, but hey, it&#8217;s your character that really needs fixing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Z.</title>
		<link>http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/03/26/hypocrisy-in-kenner/#comment-1325</link>
		<author>Daniel Z.</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/03/26/hypocrisy-in-kenner/#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>There might be some sexism involved in the hypocrisy. However, the double standard here makes me think about the possibility of something else fueling this fire. I really don't know what it would be. Perhaps she voted against something (or for something) that someone else didn't like. Perhaps something happened behind the scenes and she wouldn't work with someone who wanted something done. I don't know what it could be. However, the amount of coverage this incident is getting is disproportional to what it should be getting (even for some of the holier than thou people who are activists in Kenner).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There might be some sexism involved in the hypocrisy. However, the double standard here makes me think about the possibility of something else fueling this fire. I really don&#8217;t know what it would be. Perhaps she voted against something (or for something) that someone else didn&#8217;t like. Perhaps something happened behind the scenes and she wouldn&#8217;t work with someone who wanted something done. I don&#8217;t know what it could be. However, the amount of coverage this incident is getting is disproportional to what it should be getting (even for some of the holier than thou people who are activists in Kenner).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: celcus</title>
		<link>http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/03/26/hypocrisy-in-kenner/#comment-1320</link>
		<author>celcus</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/03/26/hypocrisy-in-kenner/#comment-1320</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is apples and oranges (or is it bananas?) Vitter being a man, has needs, so he can be excused, boy will be boys and all that. That woman, however, did not show the proper level of virginal modesty, and probably wore pants or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is apples and oranges (or is it bananas?) Vitter being a man, has needs, so he can be excused, boy will be boys and all that. That woman, however, did not show the proper level of virginal modesty, and probably wore pants or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
