A failure in logic
According to Bayou Buzz, LAGOP Executive Director Matt Parker (Jindal’s homeschooled homeboy’s brother in law) stated this about Mary Landrieu and her failure to respond to Nagin’s endorsement of Barack Obama:
Today’s endorsement raises more questions than answers. In a press release announcing today’s endorsement, Nagin cited ‘Obama’s advocacy for the people of
Louisiana and working men and women across the county’ and specifically his work to address the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Does Mary Landrieu disagree with Nagin? Why won’t Landrieu stand up and let Louisianans know why she won’t endorse Obama?”
Say what?!?!?! Mabye Landrieu doesn’t want to take sides. Maybe Landrieu would be happy voting for either of the two Democrats against John 100 years in Iraq McCain. Maybe Landrieu figures that she can be silent in a race where the presumptive Republican nominee didn’t get the most votes in the Republican primary. Maybe Mary Landrieu didn’t feel that she needed to make an anouncement over an endorsement by someone else. Or maybe, just maybe, Mary Landrieu doesn’t feel the need to answer to the head of the party who is trying to unseat her. I would at least go with the last one, though others may be valid as well.
This is just a silly question raised by Matt Parker. Now, is he the voice of Cartman? Or is that Trey Stone? See, I got the names mixed up and even those are better questions than the brainchild of Homeschool’s brother in law.
The idea that Nagin’s endorsement raises more questions than it answers is absurd. I guess the Republicans set the bar low when they chose their executive director.