Liberty and Justice for All!

I LOVE the line in response to Senator McCain. This is very important to read, regardless of what side of the political spectrum you reside.

Mr. President, I rise today in support of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. I have served in public office for 30 years as a State Representative, State Treasurer and a U.S. Senator. But it doesn’t take 30 years of experience to know that our health care system is entirely too expensive and does not adequately cover enough Louisianians. From my visits with doctors and nurses, to seniors on Medicare to recent college graduates struggling to afford coverage, it is clear to me that reform now is essential. 

In Louisiana, the average family spends more than $12,000 each year for health insurance, or almost 100 percent of earnings from a full-time job paying minimum wage. Since 2000, the amount that working families are charged for health insurance has risen by 91 percent. And if Congress stood by and did nothing, those costs would nearly double in the next 6 years, with economists predicting that Louisiana’s families will pay a whopping $23,133 for insurance in 2016 – an 85 percent increase. To state that in a different way, that means that if we do nothing, the average family in my state will be paying 60 percent of their income for healthcare – leaving only 40 percent of their wages to cover food, education of children, housing, transportation and everything else. This is not unique to Louisiana – these skyrocketing costs are burdening families in every state in the union.

Small businesses are also struggling to remain competitive and to turn a profit. In the face of highly unstable, unpredictable health care costs this gets harder and harder. As Chair of the Senate Small Business Committee, I have held 23 hearings and roundtables this year and several of them have been focused on how the current health care system and volatile health care costs are hurting the nation’s small businesses. Today, small businesses are seeing their health care costs increase faster than the prices of the products and services they sell – four times faster than the rate of inflation since 2001. Premiums for single policies increased by 74 percent for small businesses in the last eight years, according to a 2009 Kaiser Family Foundation survey. Nationally, 40 percent of small businesses say that health care costs have had a negative impact on other parts of their business.

Even though families, businesses and government budgets are being mercilessly squeezed by unsustainable health care costs, Senate Republicans are doing everything they can to preserve the status quo. Why? Each day, they find a new excuse for their obstruction. I wish they had put the same amount of passion, energy and creative thinking into contributing policy ideas to this debate as they have into their delaying tactics. Every amendment they offered was to send the bill backwards, not forwards. They were hellbent on defeating, not improving, this bill.

Senate Republicans have charged that we are rushing into voting for this bill. That is simply not true. We have been debating this issue for most of this year and on and off for the last 40 years.  

Republican President Theodore Roosevelt made national health insurance a plank in his party platform when he sought the presidency as a Bull-Moose Party candidate in 1912. President Harry Truman, in 1945 and then again in 1948, called on Congress to pass reform legislation that would expand quality health care coverage to more Americans. President Truman believed we needed a stronger system and that the federal government must play a role in establishing a more robust system of care. His critics called his approach “socialized medicine.” Sound familiar? Only in Washington would 87 years be considered rushing. 

Instead of coming to the table and working with Democrats to write a bipartisan health care reform bill, Republicans chose to put partisan politics first. Fabricating “death panels”, distorting Medicare cuts and undermining and disrespecting the role of government in protecting its citizens, they have engaged in a relentless misinformation campaign aimed solely at using fear to sway public opinion against this bill. Recently, Senator McCain has been claiming that the American people are opposed to reform and speaking about “the will of the majority.” I would remind my colleague from Arizona that the will of the majority was heard loud and clear last November.

While Republicans have tried to paint a picture of a nation opposed to health care reform, recent polls show otherwise and tell us a lot about the current “will of the majority.”  When we cut through all the misinformation and scare tactics and Americans hear what is in the bill, they overwhelmingly support it.  According to a recent CNN poll, 73 percent of Americans support expanding Medicaid to the poor.   That same poll showed providing subsidies for families that make up to $88,000 a year is favored by 67 percent of Americans.  Additional regulations on insurance companies, such as banning denial of coverage for those with preexisting conditions are favored by 60 percent of the American people.   

A poll by the Mellman Group shows that this support exists in each state, as well.  In my own home state of Louisiana, when the provisions of the bill were actually read to voters, 57 percent of Louisianians supported the bill, with 43 percent strongly supporting reform.  And, most importantly, 62 pecent Louisianians oppose using the filibuster to stop health care reform.

            The American people elected President Obama to bring about change. A big part of the change President Obama and Democrats promised during the campaign was improving health care for all Americans. Thanks to the President’s leadership and the leadership of Senator Reid and many others, we are taking several meaningful steps toward fulfilling that promise.With the exception of our two colleagues from Maine, Republicans have failed to negotiate in good faith. I am disappointed that not a single Republican could support an end to the filibuster. I suppose it is easy to stay unified when the only word in your vocabulary is “NO”. Although Democrats did not initially agree on exactly how to get there, we were united in saying “YES” to the common goal of delivering meaningful health care reform to America’s families and small businesses. I do hold out hope that when we take our vote on final passage, they will recognize this historic opportunity and vote in favor of this bill that will reduce costs and increase access to health care for millions of Americans.

Last month, I stood here on the floor of the Senate to announce my intention to vote in favor of bringing Leader Reid’s melded bill to the floor. At the time, I was very clear that my vote was not an indication that I supported that particular version of the bill. My vote was to bring the bill to the floor so we could do the legislative work the American people sent us here to do. Through weeks of floor debate, amendments and round-the-clock negotiations, we have produced a health care bill that is significantly improved. 

            Through tough negotiations, Senate Democrats have developed a consensus that blends the best of private and public approaches to reduce cost, expand coverage and increase choice and competition for Americans, and have done so without a government-run public option. Since I continue to hear distortions from my colleagues on the other side of the aisle and confusion from my constituents, let me be clear: There is no government-run public option in this bill. 

            Instead, we reached agreement on a provision to allow private health insurance plans to be sold nationwide. The Office of Personnel Management will negotiate lower premiums – just as they negotiate the plans currently available to Members of Congress. Importantly, we ensured that at least one non-profit plan will be offered in every state and that states cannot opt out of. These national plans will be available to every state in the nation, which is a monumental achievement and a reform asked for by my constituents, regardless of political ideology. For the first time in our nation’s history, Americans will have an opportunity to have the same kind of insurance that federal employees have, including members of Congress. That’s a promise the president made. And we’re keeping it.

There has been a lot of talk about the cost of this bill to the government and taxpayers. There have been a number of false claims about how this bill will add to the deficit and be a burden to our children and grandchildren. The fact of the matter is that the bill is completely paid for and will reduce the deficit by $132 billion over the next 10 years and as much as $1.3 trillion in the following 10 years. I joined almost 20 Democratic colleagues to insist on strong cost containment measures.

Based on our efforts, the Congressional Budget Office and the nation’s premier economists have confirmed that premiums will go down or remain stable, so that wages for millions of Americans can increase. When this bill is passed, 31 million uninsured Americans will have access to quality health care coverage. This bill is a big step toward fiscal responsibility and a stronger economy.

The bill achieves this goal by streamlining the health insurance market, ensuring efficiency and limiting insurance company administrative costs and profits. It also imposes an excise tax on insurance companies with high-cost plans. This encourages employers to become more value-conscious purchasers of health-care insurance. Employers are expected to choose cheaper plans, and as less capital is spent on health care, wages will go up for hard-working families. Economists predict this gives American workers a $223 billion pay raise, amounting to $660 per household. We have also created administrative savings through the health insurance exchange, and during Senate consideration of the bill strengthened the Independent Medicare Advisory Board to find more ways to reduce cost growth and improve quality.

The bill has improved in several key ways since we voted to bring it to the floor. The final Senate bill includes a substantial investment in Community Health Clinics and will provide funding to expand access to health care in rural communities and underserved urban areas as well. In Louisiana, the federally supported health clinics have saved the state $354 million in emergency room visits by the uninsured. The legislation also expands access by funding for rural health care providers and training programs for physician and other health care providers. 

            There are many parts of the current bill that I am proud to have fought for.  The bill creates health insurance exchanges that will provide individuals, families, and small businesses with a wide variety of affordable choices and ensure that they will always have coverage, whether they change jobs, lose a job, move or get sick. These state-based exchanges will enable consumers to comparison shop online for health insurance which will drive down costs by increasing choice and competition. 

The exchange will help the uninsured obtain needed coverage and will also help the more than 200,000 Louisiana residents who currently do not have insurance through their employer to get quality coverage at an affordable price. Many of these Louisianians in the exchange will qualify for a tax credit to help them purchase the insurance of their choice.

For example, in Calcasieu Parish, the median household income is $39,713. In the exchange created by this bill, the average family in Calcasieu would receive an affordability credit that limits what they spend on their premium to around 5.6% of their income or $2,225. Considering, right now the average Louisiana family is spending up to 28 percent of their income on health care, this is a huge improvement. 

This version of the bill that we improved on the Senate floor now includes much-needed help for small business owners. While small businesses make up 74 percent of Louisiana’s businesses, only 37 percent of them offered health coverage benefits in 2008. Of those, 62 percent say they are struggling to do so. Of the 64 percent who do not provide insurance, 87 percent say they cannot afford it.

I worked closely with Sen. Stabenow to improve affordability and choices for small businesses and amended the bill to make the “Bridge Credit” available immediately to help small businesses afford health insurance for their employees, and improve the tax credits for small businesses. This means that small businesses who want to offer quality health insurance to their employees will get tax breaks right way, rather than waiting until 2011. I also worked with Senator Lincoln to expand the number of small businesses that will be eligible for tax credits so that more small businesses get help in offering health insurance coverage for their employees – allowing more small business workers to benefit. In all, these changes bring an additional $13 billion in tax relief — on top of the $27 billion already in the bill — to small businesses.

If you are a small business with 25 employees or less here is how reform will help you: Businesses with 25 or less employees whose average annual wages are less than $50,000 will get immediate help through a three-year bridge credit. The creation of exchanges and a two-year exchange tax credit will lift the burden of excessive paperwork and administrative costs. The exchanges will create more stable, secure choices for your employees. In Louisiana, more than 50,000 small businesses could be helped by this small business tax credit proposal.

            This will help small business owners like Mary Noel Black and her husband, who own a UPS franchise store in Baton Rouge. They offer their four employees group coverage and are willing to pay half the cost, but the premium rates have gone up so much that neither the workers nor the business can afford to pay the $3,600 a year per employee for insurance. To help Mary pay for the health insurance of each employee, beginning in 2011, Mary could get a $1,260 bridge credit per employee under this bill for three years. Then, in 2014, if she purchases coverage through the exchange, her business is eligible for an exchange credit of $1,800 per employee for an even more generous tax credit for another two years. This savings could mean the difference between offering insurance or dropping coverage because instead of costing her business $14,400 a year now for her four employees – a cost that is just unaffordable – the tax credit could initially bring her cost down to $9,360 and later to $7,200.

Through our work on the Senate floor during this public debate, we have made this good bill better for small business.  Not only have we extended and expanded the small business tax credits, the legislation includes several amendments I authored to ensure small businesses continue to have a seat at the table once this bill is implemented.

The bill requires small businesses receive information regarding reinsurance for early retirees, small business tax credits, and other issues specifically for small businesses regarding affordable health care options. 

It lists Small Business Administration resource partners as eligible recipients of Exchange public awareness grants. And, it will include all Small Business Administration partners in the program, including: Women’s Business Centers, SCORE, Minority Business Centers, Veteran Business Centers, and others. 

The legislation now requires the Government Accountability Office to specifically review the impact of exchanges on access to affordable health care for small businesses to ensure that exchanges are indeed making a difference for small business owners. 

It also clearly states that agencies cannot waive the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which requires them to report small business contracting numbers and meet small business contracting goals of 23 percent. 

There is a provision that modifies the definition of a full-time employee to take into account fluctuation in employee hours, and reduce the impact of employer responsibility requirements for industries with high turnover and that rely on part-time employees.

The bill eliminates penalties for businesses that wait up to 60 days to provide health insurance to their full-time employees.

Finally, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act establishes a national workforce commission to gather information on the health care workforce and better coordinate and implement workforce planning and analysis. The manager’s amendment ensures that small businesses and the self-employed will be represented on the commission.

These are important considerations for small businesses and I was proud to ensure these concerns were addressed through the amendment process.

            Despite claims from opponents of the bill, we have taken important steps to strengthen Medicare, not weaken it. The Senate health care reform bill creates an Independent Medicare Advisory Board to find ways to reduce cost growth and improve quality and moves to a system that rewards quality care over quantity. It reduces payments for preventable hospital readmissions in Medicare, and cuts waste, fraud, and abuse by screening providers, enhanced oversight, and identifying areas prone to fraud, and by requiring Medicare and Medicaid providers and suppliers to establish compliance programs.

            As much as Republicans have tried to scare seniors into opposing this bill, the fact is that Louisiana’s 650,000 Medicare beneficiaries stand to benefit from the Democrats’ health care reform bill. The bill lowers premiums by reducing Medicare’s overpayments to private plans. All Medicare beneficiaries pay the price of excessive overpayments through higher premiums – even the 78 percent of seniors in Louisiana who are not enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. Without reform, a typical couple in traditional Medicare would pay nearly $90 in additional Medicare premiums next year to subsidize these private plans.

Our bill extends the life of the Medicare Trust Fund by 9 years and lays the groundwork for a more sustainable health system. Thanks to these reform efforts, there will be no additional cost for preventive services under the Medicare program. Beneficiaries will not pay anything extra for things like mammograms and colonoscopies. This includes a free wellness visit and personalized prevention plan designed to help give beneficiaries the resources they need to take better care of themselves in these important years.

This legislation puts taxpayers’ dollars above insurance company profits by forcing insurers to bid competitively for the business of Medicare beneficiaries and makes changes to the Medicare Advantage payment structure that will give insurers an incentive to deliver more value for taxpayers’ money. 

Another critical aspect of the bill is that it increases the amount of drug coverage for Medicare Part D beneficiaries before they have to begin to pay out of pocket for their prescriptions. Right now, roughly 116,000 Medicare beneficiaries in Louisiana hit a wall in Medicare Part D drug coverage that will cost some of them an average of $4,080 per year. This reform legislation will provide a 50 percent discount for brand-name drugs.

Some of the bill’s most important provisions will benefit the most important population – children.  I was proud that Leader Reid included a provision, at my request, that will ensure that youth who age out of the foster care system will be able to stay on Medicaid until the age of 26. Almost 30,000 young people age out of the foster care system every year, having never been adopted or reunified with their birth parents. The fact that they “aged out” is our failure as government. We have failed them once and we just cannot fail them twice. We must support their transition to adulthood. Guaranteeing quality health care will go along toward helping this transition.

When this legislation is signed into law, insurance companies will not be able to drop children for preexisting conditions beginning immediately. This is crucial for families with children who have battled cancer or diabetes. When a parent loses a job, they may struggle to get insurance when they find new employment. Once this bill becomes law, no insurance company will be able to deny a child with preexisting conditions.

Another critical provision is that this bill will require insurance companies to allow children to stay on their parents’ insurance until the age of 26. According to the latest data from the Census Bureau, in 2007 there were an estimated 13.2 million uninsured young adults. This provision will help reduce that number by allowing young people to stay on their parents’ coverage for a bit longer.

This health care reform bill also holds insurance companies’ feet to the fire to ensure they are accountable to their customers. By 2014, insurers will not be able to deny coverage due to preexisting conditions. That means they will not be allowed to drop you from coverage if you get sick or are in an accident. 

Because of Sen. Rockefeller’s and Sen. Ben Nelson’s work, this bill requires insurance companies to disclose the pricing of their benefits to ensure that premiums are spent on health benefits, not profits, and gives consumers rebates, putting the insurance companies’ excessive profits back into your pockets. It contains new requirements ensuring that insurers and health care providers report on their performance, empowering patients to make the best possible decisions. Under this bill, a health insurer’s participation in the exchanges will depend on its performance. Insurers that jack up their premiums before the exchanges begin will be excluded – a powerful incentive to keep premiums affordable. 

Finally, I was also proud to work with Leader Reid and Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus to address an inequity in the formula that determines the federal match of Medicaid dollars. As we all know, in 2005 Hurricanes Katrina and Rita ravaged the Gulf Coast and destroyed homes, neighborhoods, and even full communities throughout South Louisiana. In an effort to aid the recovery, Congress approved a much-needed aid package for Louisianans that infused grant dollars and direct assistance to speed our recovery.

Some necessary one-time recovery dollars, in addition to labor and wage costs going up because there was a constriction in the market, were calculated into our State’s per capita income. The result has been that Louisiana’s per capita income was abnormally inflated, and put us in a category with richer states like Connecticut, Massachusetts and Maryland. 

The result is that our federal match for Medicaid dropped pretty dramatically. I worked with my colleagues to correct this formula. I never asked for special treatment for Louisiana, but only for understanding of the unintended consequences of our state’s unique situation. We only wanted to be treated fairly and not to get penalized because we have been forced to rebuild following the worst natural disaster in the United States’ history. Our federal Medicaid match rates should reflect the reality on the ground in Louisiana, not the cold calculations of inflexible federal formulas.

An important note is that this Medicaid funding fix was supported by every member of our Congressional Delegation, and specifically and repeatedly requested by our Republican Governor Bobby Jindal. Some politicians in my state may run and hide when the heat gets turned up, but that is not the way I was raised. I never have and never will run from what I think is right. I was sent here to fight for my state and that is exactly what I am doing.

Those who have dubbed this provision the “Louisiana Purchase” know little about lawmaking and even less about my views on health care reform. This Medicaid fix alone would not have been enough to earn my vote on this legislation. This was one of literally a dozen priorities I had as the Senate considered health care reform. I am voting for this bill because it achieves the goals I laid out at the beginning of this debate: it drives down costs and expands affordable health care choices for millions of families and small businesses in Louisiana and around the nation. Any claim to the contrary, is a pathetic lie meant to derail this bill, a tactic that was all too common during this debate. 

These are just some of the ways that this bill will reduce costs and expand access to health care for millions of Americans. Today, we stand on the verge of history, with an opportunity to support a bill that will provide health insurance to 31 million more Americans, reducing the deficit by $132 billion over the next 10 years.

 The bill is not perfect. It is not the exact health care bill that I would have written. I think the same could be said for each of my colleagues. It was a long, difficult process and during the course of completing this landmark bill there were a lot of twists and turns. But, as former President Clinton was fond of saying, we should never let the perfect become the enemy of the good. 

And, this is a good bill that will improve health care for the local grocery store owner in Jennings, the 22-year old in Lake Charles who has just left the foster care system, the single mother of three in Monroe, the nine year old boy in Natchitoches who was just diagnosed with diabetes and the 70 year old Medicare recipient in Houma who worked for three decades in the offshore oil industry. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act makes a difference in these lives and millions more across America, and I urge my colleagues to support it. I yield the floor.

She only gets one exclamation point.

I expected her to win. I had no doubts. I am just glad Kennedy was unable to spin and lie his way to a victory.

Louisiana will have a strong senior senator to work with our President Elect and the Democratic Congress. I expect great things for Louisiana in the years to come.

Since others are jumping in with their guesses, here are my predictions.

This is what I feel is the absolute maximum number of votes that Barack Obama can get.

However, this is the map that I predict will win Obama the election.

I also predict that Bill Jefferson will defeat Helena Moreno and move on to the general election. Personally, I have some real problems with voting with Helena Moreno (namely her acceptance of the endorsement of the R.D.O.). However, I just cannot bring myself to “vote for the crook”.

Finally, I predict that Landrieu will defeat Kennedy for the Senate seat but that the Democrats will only manage to get 59 seats (though I hope I am wrong and we manage 60).

Update: I think we may have 60 in the bag, thanks to Chambliss refering to black voters as “the other folks” who are voting. Good job Saxby. Way to show your true colors.

The numbers are astounding and these are current as of Monday at 6:30 (people still voted after 6:30 because of long lines).

Democrats lead Republicans in early voting by a nearly 2 to 1 margin and account for nearly 60% of the early voters.

If McCain has any weakness in Louisiana (I am not saying he has one, but if he does) it has to be the fact that Democrats have a much better get out the vote machine so far. If this keeps up through tomorrow (the end of early voting) then election day may be very interesting.

And even if this doesn’t help Obama win Louisiana, it has to help Mary Landrieu (who just nabbed another big Republican endorsement in Dave Treen).

Roger Villere (i.e. Florist Gump) is looking for a way to put a “meaningful” censure on those Republicans who put the needs of Louisiana over the needs of the Party by crossing party lines and endorsing a *gasp* Democrat.

Perhaps those Republicans didn’t consider themselves to be political whores who, unlike Villere, are looking for results for their voters instead of looking to just put an R in the seat (even though that “R” was a “D” in 2004, and according to the Republican party in 2004 was the more liberal Democrat in the race).

A caller to the Jeff Crouereshow on AM 990 this morning doubted that Landrieu would ever endorse someone who was not a Democrat. I had to call in and remind them that Landrieu did not endorse the Democrat against Joe Lieberman in his most recent election. Jeff pointed out that this was not an example of her supporting a Republican. However, it is an example of her rejecting the Democrat for another candidate who is not a Democrat.

Landrieu has also been a moderate in the Senate and has crossed party lines to get important legislation passed for Louisiana. And in the upcoming Senate, where Democrats are going to have control, it would be kind of silly to elect a freshman Republican who will be incapable of getting anything done for our State.

My vote will be going for Mary Landrieu.

John Kennedy is complaining that Landrieu hasn’t committed to debate on his timetable. Her response?

“Sen. Landrieu looks forward to a series of debates with Mr. Kennedy in October when the important work of this Congress is completed. Meanwhile, she will be travelling to every part of the state to discuss the merits of the New ERA energy proposal, which is a very significant piece of legislation that will lower gas prices and transition the country to alternative fuels and energy independence.

“In the meantime, if John Kennedy wants to debate before then, he should debate himself given that he has taken both sides of every issue.”

Excellent.

Yes, Landrieu should debate and it seems that she will do it in October. Seems like Kennedy is making much ado about nothing.

That is an old quote from The Gipper himself, Ronald Reagan. And the Louisiana Republicans have dusted that old tired line out to try and convince current Democrats to turn over a new leaf (just like John N. Kennedy did).

Of course there is probably some truth Reagan’s statement. See, the Democratic Party stopped being the party that used the mantra of “states rights” in order to keep black people as second class citizens and started to become the party that fought for civil rights legislation, equality, and liberty.

Reagan, on the other hand, announced the official start to his campaign in Neshoba County Mississippi, the site where three black civil rights activists were murdered in 1964. Reagan campaigned on the “states rights” platform and utilized the “southern strategy” to attract the racists who also felt that the Democratic Party left them too. Since Reagan felt that the place where three black civil rights activists were murdered was the best way to start off his “states rights” campaign then sure, the Democratic Party left him behind … in the dust.
You can see the front and back of the flier (or should I say f-liar) my wife received in the mail today.

Not only does the f-liar have a picture of the Gipper, but it also has one of the Governor himself. It asks Democrats to “join Bobby Jindal in the Republican Party”.

Most noticeable are the prominent Democrats that are pictured on the f-liar. You have Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Kathleen Blanco and everyone’s favorite Bill Jefferson. Absent is Mary Landrieu (who is likely to win re-election), Mitch Landrieu (who got more votes that Jindal statewide) and other Louisiana Democrats who tend to be a tad bit more Conservative on the issues than those pictured (with the exception of pro-life Blanco whose only difference with Jindal on the pro-life stance is that she has a heart and would allow exceptions for rape and the life of the woman).

The f-liar says what “Democrats Believe In”.

The first lie is that we believe in no new oil exploration. Well, there are 10,000 oil leases that are not being drilled on yet. Seems to me that the Democrats would not have allowed those leases to be opened if they are opposed to new drilling.

The next lie is that Democrats support Amnesty for illegal aliens. The truth is that Democrats in Congress supported a plan that would require any person here illegally to get back in the line and pay a fine for their crime before ever getting a chance at citizenship. Forcing someone to pay a fine does not sound like amnesty to me. Of course, the Louisiana Republican Party and Florist Gump himself forgets that Republicans don’t want illegal immigration to go away because that would mean their corporate buddies would have to hire people at the minimum wage. I would also point out that the plan Democrats supported was called the ________ - Kennedy Fair Plan. Anyone? Anyone? The McCain – Kennedy Fair plan. So if this plan is so called “amnesty” then I guess anyone who supports McCain wants “amnesty” too!

The next lie is that Democrats support tax increases on the middle class. This is, again, untrue. Democrats support eliminating the bush tax cuts for people making $200,000 and above. In fact, here is Obama’s tax plan.You can plainly see that he wouldn’t increase taxes on the middle class.

In fact, when I campaigned for Congress in 2004 I proposed that we give a housing tax credit to everyone and not require it be itemized. Obama supports:

establishing a universal credit for the 10 million homeowners who do not itemize their deductions

Good to see someone else agrees with me. 

They tell the truth about Government run health care. Democrats do support that. Of course, if you want to look at failures in Government run healthcare you only need to look at the tenure of Bobby Jindal and his time as head of the Louisiana Department of Health. During his “leadership”, Louisiana’s health ranking dropped to dead last. But that is just typical of Republicans. They cry about how awful government is and then spend their entire political careers proving it

The f-liar asks “what do you have in common with these Democrats”? Well, if I had to make a flier of my own, it would probably look like this. (Well, actually I would spend a lot more time on it, not do it in paint, and not base it off the old one, but you get the point).

Anyway, it sure seems that the Republicans are scared that they won’t be able to get John “the liberal candidate in the 2004 Senate race” Kennedy to beat Landrieu. I am happy my wife got the f-liar. It was good for a laugh and it is good to see the Republicans wasting money on that garbage.

It is time that the Times Picayune gave credit where credit is due. In it’s recent article (Demos vow to erase state share of levee cost) the Times Picayune reported that Bobby Jindal sponsored the legislation that allowed Louisiana to collect offshore oil royalties. This is factually incorrect. Bobby Jindal did sponsor legislation to get us a share of oil revenues and that bill passed the House. However, the Domenici-Landrieu bill was passed in the Senate, emerged from the conference committee unchanged, was passed by the House (in lieu of Jindal’s legislation) and was signed by the President. It was Mary Landrieu, and not Bobby Jindal, who got us a fairer share of oil revenues.

John Neely Kennedy*.

He probably felt that he would be able to ride the Republican coat tails of Bobby Jindal by defecting to the Republican party and running against Mary Landrieu. Unfortunately for him, Jindal proved that he had no spine and that he was willing to go against both the will of the people and the promise he made during his campaign.

Yes there are other losers. Jindal lost the respect of many of his fiscal conservative supporters. Several legislators are getting recall petitions submitted against them with more likely to come. The Media is being criticised for not doing their job in the 2007 election. But Kennedy was going for statewide election against a Democrat in a state that is turning redder and redder as we speak. The support of Jindal would have helped him immeasurably. Now, the support of Jindal will likely hurt JNK more than it helps. And while i never actually thought that JNK could win, the likelihood of him winning now is much less. And that, my friends, makes me smile.

* speaking politically only.

According to Bayou Buzz, LAGOP Executive Director Matt Parker (Jindal’s homeschooled homeboy’s  brother in law) stated this about Mary Landrieu and her failure to respond to Nagin’s endorsement of Barack Obama:

Today’s endorsement raises more questions than answers.  In a press release announcing today’s endorsement, Nagin cited ‘Obama’s advocacy for the people of

Louisianaand working men and women across the county’ and specifically his work to address the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.   Does Mary Landrieu disagree with Nagin?  Why won’t Landrieu stand up and let Louisianans know why she won’t endorse Obama?”

Say what?!?!?! Mabye Landrieu doesn’t want to take sides. Maybe Landrieu would be happy voting for either of the two Democrats against John 100 years in Iraq McCain. Maybe Landrieu figures that she can be silent in a race where the presumptive Republican nominee didn’t get the most votes in the Republican primary. Maybe Mary Landrieu didn’t feel that she needed to make an anouncement over an endorsement by someone else. Or maybe, just maybe, Mary Landrieu doesn’t feel the need to answer to the head of the party who is trying to unseat her. I would at least go with the last one, though others may be valid as well.

This is just a silly question raised by Matt Parker. Now, is he the voice of Cartman? Or is that Trey Stone? See, I got the names mixed up and even those are better questions than the brainchild of Homeschool’s brother in law.

The idea that Nagin’s endorsement raises more questions than it answers is absurd. I guess the Republicans set the bar low when they chose their executive director.